A long-awaited report on how women born in the 1950s were affected by increases to their retirement age has recommended they are owed compensation.
An investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) found that thousands of women may have been adversely impacted by the government’s failure to adequately inform them of the change.
Politics Live: Autumn timeframe’ for election, minister says
To date, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has not acknowledged its failings or put things right for those women, the watchdog said.
The ombudsman noted that the department has indicated it won’t comply with the findings and called on parliament to intervene.
PHSO chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath, said: ”The UK’s national ombudsman has made a finding of failings by DWP in this case and has ruled that the women affected are owed compensation.
“DWP has clearly indicated that it will refuse to comply. This is unacceptable. The department must do the right thing and it must be held to account for failure to do so. ”
More on Pensions Related Topics: pensionsMs Hilsenrath said that given the ombudsman’s “significant concerns” that the DWP won’t act on its findings, “we have proactively asked parliament to intervene and hold the department to account”.
“Parliament now needs to act swiftly, and make sure a compensation scheme is established. We think this will provide women with the quickest route to remedy.”
Advertisement Who are the WASPI women and what happened to them? Jennifer Scott @NifSIn the mid-1990s, the government passed a law to raise the retirement age for women over a 10-year period to make it equal with men.
The coalition government then sped up the timetable as part of its cost-cutting measures.
But the Women Against State Pension Inequality or WASPIs said millions suffered financially as a result, as they were not given enough warning by the government to prepare for the changes to their retirement date.
The group began a long campaign to seek compensation for the women affected – namely those born in the 1950s.
And after a five-year investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, the watchdog sided with them, saying not only did the Department for Work and Pensions fail to communicate the changes properly, they also didn’t investigate complaints as they should.
The PHSO has suggested the WASPIs should now receive compensation, but the recommendation is not legally binding, and it will be for the government to decide.
The finding follows a long-running campaign by the Women Against State Pension Inequality – often known as WASPI women.
The group say millions suffered financially as they were not given sufficient warning to prepare for the change to their retirement age.
The ombudsman’s report suggested that, in the sample cases it has seen, women should receive compensation of between £1,000 and £2,95 – Level 4 on the compensation scale.
However, the findings are not legally binding.
WASPI women ‘very disappointed’ in DWP
Angela Madden, chair of WASPI, told Sky News she wanted to see the government grant Level 6 compensation of £10,000 or more.
5:27 Is WASPI compensation good enough?While this would cost the exchequer around £36bn, she said the government “have saved £181bn by increasing the state pension age” for women.
“Had they told us, when they first decided in 1995 this was going to happen, we would have had 15 years notice,” she said.
“I got a letter in March 2012, two years before I expected to retire, and that letter told me I wasn’t getting my state pension until March 2020. I was absolutely devastated.
I’d already given up work to spend time with my then ailing mother. I couldn’t unmake that decision and had Ihad the right information. I wouldn’t have made that decision.”
She added that she is “very disappointed in the DWP” and called on whoever wins the next election to act swiftly on compensation.
“It needs to happen soon as more than 270,000 women have died since we started this campaign”, she said.
Image: WASPI women argue millions suffered financially because they didn’t know about the changesWhy was the sate pension age changed for women?
The state pension age was aligned to match men in a move praised for improving gender equality.
For decades, men had retired at 65 while women had retired at 60.
A law was passed in 1995 setting out a timetable to eventually raise the retirement age for women so it would match the age for men.
Read More:Generation of women in debt after state pension fallout
The original plan was to phase in the change over a 10-year period between 2010 and 2020 to allow people sufficient time to plan ahead.
However, in 2011 the coalition government accelerated the shift to reduce costs, with the increase in retirement age brought forward to 2018.
WASPI agrees with the equalisation of ages, but says they were not properly informed of the changes, giving them insufficient time to prepare or make other financial arrangements.
The ombudsman investigated complaints that, since 1995, the DWP has failed to provide accurate, adequate and timely information about areas of state pension reform.
The ombudsman published stage one of its investigation in July 2021, which found failings in the way the department communicated changes to women’s state pension age.
The DWP’s handling of the pension age changes meant some women lost opportunities to make informed decisions about their finances and diminished their sense of personal autonomy and financial control, the ombudsman said.
Liberal Democrat Chief Whip Wendy Chamberlain said WASPI women have “tirelessly campaigned for justice after being left out of pocket”.
She added: “Liberal Democrats have long supported WASPI in their campaign and it is now up to this Conservative government to come forward with a plan to get these women the compensation they are owed.”